Title
Consider/Discuss/Act on a Site Plan for an Office/Warehouse Building, Located Approximately 440 feet East of Redbud Boulevard and on the South Side of Corporate Drive
Summary
COUNCIL GOAL: Direction for Strategic and Economic Growth
MEETING DATE: October 17, 2017
DEPARTMENT: Planning
CONTACT: Brian Lockley, Director of Planning, AICP, CPM
Samantha Pickett, Planning Manager, AICP
Melissa Spriegel, Planner I
RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed site plan with the following condition:
1. The applicant satisfy the conditions as shown on the Standard Conditions for Site Plan Approval Checklist, attached.
ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to construct an 112,503 square foot office/warehouse building (Redbud - McKinney Spec Building) on 6.54 acres located approximately 440 feet east of Redbud Boulevard and on the south side of Corporate Drive.
Typically site plans can be approved by Staff; however, the governing planned development zoning ordinances (PD Ordinance Nos. 1563 and 2007-04-038) require that a complete site plan and landscape plan be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to development of the property.
PLATTING STATUS: The subject property is currently platted as Lot 2RC2, Block E of the Bray Central Two Addition. An amending plat, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning, must be filed for recordation with the Collin County Clerk, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: August 8, 2017 (Original Application)
August 25, 2017 (Revised Submittal)
September 1, 2017 (Revised Submittal)
September 7, 2017 (Revised Submittal)
ZONING:
|
Location |
Zoning District (Permitted Land Uses) |
Existing Land Use |
|
Subject Property |
“PD” - Planned Development District Ordinance No. 1563 and “PD” - Planned Development District Ordinance No. 2007-04-038 (Office and Light Manufacturing Uses) |
Undeveloped Land |
|
North |
“PD” - Planned Development District Ordinance No. 1563 (Office and Light Manufacturing Uses) |
Magnetic Technology, Caliber Collision |
|
South |
“PD” - Planned Development District Ordinance No. 2011-08-051 (Office and Light Manufacturing Uses) |
McKinney Central Business Park |
|
East |
“PD” - Planned Development District Ordinance No. 98-05-30 (Office and Light Manufacturing Uses) |
Undeveloped Land |
|
West |
“PD” - Planned Development District Ordinance No. 1563 (Office and Light Manufacturing Uses) |
Atmos Energy |
ACCESS/CIRCULATION:
|
Adjacent Streets: |
Corporate Drive, 65’ Right-of-Way, Collector |
PARKING: The applicant has satisfied the minimum parking requirements as specified within Section 146-130 (Vehicle Parking) of the Zoning Ordinance.
LOADING SPACES: The applicant has satisfied the minimum loading space requirements as specified within Section 146-131 (Off-Street Loading) of the Zoning Ordinance.
SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS: The sanitation container screening walls will be brick, stone masonry or other architectural masonry finish, including a metal gate, primed and painted, and the sanitation container screening walls, gate, and pad site will be constructed in accordance with the City of McKinney Design Specifications. The applicant has provided the required notation on the proposed site plan.
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: The applicant has satisfied all landscaping requirements as specified in Section 146-135 (Landscape Requirements) of the Zoning Ordinance.
SCREENING REQUIREMENTS: The applicant has provided the required notation stating that all mechanical, heating, and air conditioning equipment shall be screened from the public right-of-way and from adjacent residential properties. The applicant has properly screened the sanitation container and has satisfied the minimum requirements as specified in Section 146-132 (Fences, Walls, and Screening Requirements) of the Zoning Ordinance.
LIGHTING AND GLARE REGULATIONS: The applicant will be responsible for complying with Chapter 58 (Lighting and Glare Regulations) of the City of McKinney Code of Ordinances. The applicant has provided the required notation stating that the lighting will be in conformance to the requirements of the City of McKinney Code of Ordinances on the site plan.
ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS: The applicant will be responsible for meeting the requirements of Section 146-139 (Architectural and Site Standards) of the City of McKinney Zoning Ordinance. Architectural building elevations are subject to review and approval by the Chief Building Official, prior to issuance of a building permit.
TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: The applicant will be responsible for complying with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The applicant has submitted a tree survey, subject to review and approval of the City’s Landscape Architect.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS:
|
Sidewalks: |
Required along Corporate Drive |
|
Hike and Bike Trails: |
Not Required |
|
Road Improvements: |
All road improvements necessary for this development, and as determined by the City Engineer |
|
Utilities: |
All utilities necessary for this development, and as determined by the City Engineer |
Discussion: Under the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, the applicant will be required to construct all necessary public improvements prior to filing the accompanying plat, unless otherwise specified in an approved facilities agreement.
DRAINAGE: The applicant will be responsible for all drainage associated with the subject property, and for compliance with the Storm Water Ordinance, which may require on-site detention. Grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of a building permit.
FEES:
|
Roadway Impact Fees: |
Applicable (Ordinance No. 2013-11-108) |
|
Utility Impact Fees: |
Applicable (Ordinance No. 2017-02-021) |
|
Median Landscape Fees: |
Not Applicable |
|
Park Land Dedication Fees: |
Not Applicable |
|
Pro-Rata: |
As determined by the City Engineer |
OPPOSITION TO OR SUPPORT OF REQUEST: Staff has received no comments in support of or in opposition to this request.
BOARD OR COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On September 26, 2017 the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0-0 to recommend approval of the proposed site plan.