File #: 19-0181CVP    Name: Skyline-University Addition
Type: Agenda Item Status: Agenda Ready
In control: Planning & Zoning Commission
On agenda: 11/5/2019 Final action:
Title: Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for Lots 1R and 3, Block A, of Skyline-University Addition, Located on the North Side of U.S. Highway 380 (University Drive) and on the East Side of Skyline Drive
Attachments: 1. Location Map and Aerial Exhibit, 2. Letter of Intent, 3. Proposed Conveyance Plat, 4. Explanation for Disapproval Checklist
Related files: 20-0025PFR
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

Consider/Discuss/Act on a Conveyance Plat for Lots 1R and 3, Block A, of Skyline-University Addition, Located on the North Side of U.S. Highway 380 (University Drive) and on the East Side of Skyline Drive

 

Summary

 

COUNCIL GOAL:                     Direction for Strategic and Economic Growth

(1C: Provide a strong city economy by facilitating a balance between industrial, commercial, residential, and open space)

 

MEETING DATE:                     November 5, 2019

 

DEPARTMENT:                      Development Services - Planning Department

 

CONTACT:                                            Jennifer Arnold, AICP, Director of Planning

                     Kaitlin Gibbon, Planner I

 

APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE:                     October 7, 2019 (Original Application)

                                                                                                               

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION:  Staff recommends disapproval of the proposed conveyance plat due to lack of conformance with the Engineering Design Manual requirements and Subdivision Ordinance.

 

In order to receive final approval of the plat, the applicant has the opportunity to make one resubmittal which corrects the items currently not in conformance.

 

ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to subdivide approximately 6.709 acres into 2 lots for commercial uses.

 

Per the provisions of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, the proposed plat shall satisfy all requirements for a conveyance plat. Items currently not satisfied for the proposed conveyance plat are shown on the attachment to this report titled “Explanations for Disapproval Checklist”

 

Because Conveyance Plats are not for development purposes, a standard conditions checklist is not required.

 

OPPOSITION TO OR SUPPORT OF REQUEST:  Staff has not received any comments either in opposition to or in support of the proposed conveyance plat.