File #: 18-253    Name: ATMOS Annual Rate Review
Type: Ordinance Status: Approved
In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 3/20/2018 Final action: 3/20/2018
Title: Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance Approving a Negotiated Resolution Between the Atmos Cities Steering Committee and Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Tex Division Regarding the Company's 2017 Annual Rate Review Mechanism Filing
Attachments: 1. Ordinance, 2. Mid-Tex RRM Tariff, 3. Exhibit A
Title
Consider/Discuss/Act on an Ordinance Approving a Negotiated Resolution Between the Atmos Cities Steering Committee and Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Tex Division Regarding the Company's 2017 Annual Rate Review Mechanism Filing

Summary
COUNCIL GOAL: Financially Sound Government

MEETING DATE: March 20, 2018

DEPARTMENT: Financial Services

CONTACT: Trevor Minyard, Assistant to the City Manager


RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
* Approve the ordinance.

ITEM SUMMARY:
* The City, along with 171 other Mid-Texas Cities Served by Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Tex Division ("Atmos Mid-Tex" or "Company"), is a member of the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Atmos ("Cities"). In 2007, the Cities and Atmos Mid-Tex settled a rate application filed by the Company pursuant to Section 104.301 of the Texas Utilities Code for an interim rate adjustment commonly referred to as a GRIP filing (arising out of the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program legislation). That settlement created a substitute rate review process, referred to as Rate Review Mechanism ("RRM"), as a substitute for future filings under the GRIP statute.
* Since 2007, there have been several modifications to the original RRM Tariff. The Ordinance that resolved the Company's application under the RRM Tariff in 2017 also terminated the existing RRM Tariff and required a renegotiation of the terms of that tariff. Negotiations have taken place over the past several months, and have resulted in a revised RRM Tariff that has been agreed to by the Company. The Cities' Executive Committee has recommended acceptance of the revised RRM Tariff, which is attached to the Ordinance.
* Cities strongly opposed the GRIP process because it constitutes piecemeal ratemaking by ignoring declining expenses and increasing revenues and rewarding the Company for increasing capital investment. The GRIP process does not allow any review of the reasonableness of capital investment and does not allow cities to part...

Click here for full text