File #: HP2022-0109    Name: Certificate of Appropriateness for 101 S. Chestnut St.
Type: Agenda Item Status: Regular Agenda Item
In control: Historic Preservation Advisory Board
On agenda: 11/3/2022 Final action: 11/3/2022
Title: Consider/Discuss/Act on a Certificate of Appropriateness Request by Matthew Crittenden for Demolition of the Building at 101 S. Chestnut Street
Attachments: 1. Application, 2. Evaluation Checklist, 3. Low Priority Checklist, 4. Staff Presentation
Title
Consider/Discuss/Act on a Certificate of Appropriateness Request by Matthew Crittenden for Demolition of the Building at 101 S. Chestnut Street

Summary

COUNCIL GOAL: Enhance the Quality of Life in Downtown McKinney

MEETING DATE: November 3, 2022

DEPARTMENT: Planning Department - Development Services

CONTACT: Cassie Bumgarner, Historic Preservation Planner
Paula Jarrett Nasta, AIA, Planning Manager


RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
* Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition of the building located at 101 S. Chestnut Street.

ITEM SUMMARY:
* The applicant, Matthew Crittenden, requests approval for demolition of the commercial building at 101 S. Chestnut Street.

* The building was built circa 1930 in the 20th century commercial style.

* The building is listed as a low priority building in the 2015 Update of the Historic Resources survey. Low priority buildings typify a common local building form, architectural style or type, with little or no identified historic associations; is a moderate to severely altered resource that exemplifies a distinctive building type or architectural style, or that has only minor historic significance. A structure qualifies for this category by age alone and cannot be disqualified by alterations.

* Staff has reviewed the request and has found that demolition of the commercial building is appropriate given the lack of historical integrity and significance of the building.

* Applicant received report from Monk Consulting Engineers, Inc. who advised that the "building has two major sub-standard issues. The foundation is severely compromised and slopes approximately 3 inches in one direction at the rear of the building...The building's wood framing is substandard as the ceiling joist are sagging, the framing of the ceilings in the rear of the building are framed lower than standard ceiling heights, and the roof sag in the rear of the building."

* Applicant proposes to build ...

Click here for full text